Try to influence the G-20's agenda ... or just kick it out of town? Local activists are united in opposing the international summit of top financial powers here Sept. 24-25, but at their first mass gathering they were still divided over goals and tactics. At the June 27 organizing meeting of dozens of activist groups, some were already announcing protest events.
The meeting was sponsored by the Thomas Merton Center, a local peace and social-justice organization whose Anti-War Committee hopes to hold a major permitted march on Sept. 25. The Pittsburgh G-20 Resistance Project, a collective of local anarchists and anti-authoritarians, is scheduling its own march for 2:30 p.m. on Sept. 24.
Protests are also being slated for the days leading up to the summit. National protest organizer David Meieran proposed a Mobilization for Climate Justice to coincide with G-20 and a coal conference coming Downtown Sept. 20-23. He hopes such a "sustainability encampment ... would model the change we want to see" in the world, from the use of bicycle transportation to using local, sustainable agriculture.
Merton board member Wanda Guthrie announced that Sept. 21 is tentatively set for a march of spiritual groups. "We'd like to call the G-20 to account for what they say and what they really do," she said. "We'd also like to emphasize the separation of corporation and state."
The G-20 summit will be held at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center, but since activists expect heavy security at the site, demonstrations may be held across the Allegheny River. The North Shore "may be the only place that the G-20 folks can see one of us," noted Barney Oursler of the Mon Valley Unemployed Committee. "We may be across the river, waving."
Resistance Project members have already begun building visibility for their cause. Members are going door-to-door with a pamphlet that contends the G-20 free-trade policies "require countries to open their markets to cheap imports," even as "local economies are steamrolled." The pamphlet also complains that when poorer countries need loans from the International Monetary Fund, they're often burdened by IMF rules that pull money from education and other social services in favor of things like road improvements. Such priorities benefit multinational corporations -- and thus G-20 countries -- more than locals, the Resistance says.
The Merton meeting included representatives of the ACLU and state Sen. Jim Ferlo (D-Highland Park). Mikhail Pappas, policy and projects liaison in Ferlo's Pittsburgh office, said the senator will be the activists' "champion inside the government." Ferlo is "willing to attempt to create" negotiations with law enforcement to set ground rules -- something more traditional protest groups may desire. ACLU reps also announced legal observers and lawyers would be on hand for the event.
Marie Skoczylas of Pittsburgh Organizing Group, which has been leading local anti-war and other protests for years, announced tactical training sessions throughout the summer on everything from "Participating in a Mass Action 101" to the use of lockdown devices. The devices prevent or delay law enforcement attempts to move activists from a protest site.
"We will contest the G-20," asserted Harvey Holtz, an Indiana University of Pennsylvania professor helping to moderate the meeting. "In Seattle, they took down the meetings," he added, referring to the 1999 World Trade Organization summit that mass protests disrupted. "Can we do that here? If not, what do we do?"
In contrast, Casey Capitolo, who hopes to put a Pittsburgh labor-history display at the Merton Center in September, suggested "dialing down the combat against the G-20. They're the people who make war. We need to make peace and not divert energy" from vocally countering G-20 policies.
Several members of the Resistance Project advocated a different tack. "I'm not interested in negotiating with the G-20. I think that's pointless," said Alex Bradley, of POG. "So my goal is to disrupt the summit through a diversity of tactics."
Many at the meeting suggested trying to rally more Pittsburghers to protest G-20, or at least understand activists' grievances. Capitolo concluded that activists need "to interface with people, the people who are not here, the people who are not us ... the people who would normally be put off by everything we're doing."
-- E-mail us about this story.
Share this article:
|
|
|
|
wow, animalia libero- did you go to a public school? did you play on a public playground? who the F^ck paid for this? your mama and dada? we all paid for it via our taxes...have the police, the fire or medics ever come to your house? who paid for that? did you ride your little skateboard to the coffeehouse for work in december? who plowed the street? this is just a little local goverment infrastructure lesson...want government healthcare? who gonna pay for it? is you grandfather, the wealthy surgeon, who has been supporting your hippie dad who passed his dirty genes on to you gonna work for free? yodun- you stated "i do fuck. i also want a world where i can get up everyday and not have to deal with the pain of working, paying bills..." please practice safe sex and PLEASE do not pro-create...the world is filthy enough without your tainted seed. Dude, if you find a way that i won't have to work and pay bills f^cking call me...i'll take two. Your lazy and want an excuse for it. get a better job and live like the rest of us...
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Oh and one last thing, since we are tossing quotes around: "Gandhi remained committed to nonviolence; I followed the Gandhian strategy for as long as I could, but then there came a point in our struggle when the brute force of the oppressor could no longer be countered through passive resistance alone." -Nelson Mandela "Where choice is set between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence... I prefer to use arms in defense of honor rather than remain the vile witness of dishonor ..." -Gandhi I didn't post these to condone 9/11 btw which you will surely try to spin my comments as. But, since this all started on a thread about g20 activism, you should look into the government's actions before, during, and after 9/11 to find the answers to your issues.
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Personal insults are always the best way to show you can't address someone's argument, Yailbloor. You have fun at your workshop. Hopefully it helps things.
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I am getting my information from most of the Pro-enviro community that understands barely a snipet of reality comes from the Animal Planet or conversation at poetry jam sessions and the like. You are so completely unorganized and unrealistic I wont attempt to embarrass you further by trying to illustrate how the real world actually works. Instead, I will point you towards a couple of resources that you will no doubt completely not look at. Notheless, In about three hours, I will be attending another workshop for marine environmental pollution in regards to environmentally sensitive areas, and have little time to devote to someone who is so clearly and ignorantly out-gunned that they can barely see we have similar goals. The only difference is that I accept the unpleasant tasks instead of bitching about the issues and not accepting facts. maritimelaw.com www.state.gov/g/oes/ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1217 Also, there is great research to be done by searching for 33CFR, which governs environmental regulations. No doubt, unless you are truly mentally ill, you despised the acts of 9/11 and everything that went with it. I will leave you with this quote: "We are a violent species, and we always solve our problems with violence. There have been no exceptions. Nonviolent victories are a myth. Force has always prevailed…One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter." ---Paul Watson
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|
|
|
|
|
Yailbloor, it seems to me that you are getting your information from anti-enviro propaganda sources and not what Paul Watson and his ship actually does. They do not collide with vessels and their actions strictly involve damage to the whaling boats not to the lives of people on them. They even offered to help the whalers seek out a lost person who fell from a ship once even though they knew he was already dead. They throw stink bombs at ships to make their whale meat unusable but do not harm life. The ships seek out and kill an endangered species for taste buds while shooting live rounds and throwing grenades at the sea shepherd ship. Who is in the wrong here? As for an environmental law degree, the law is doing a great job for the anti-whaling efforts isn't it? Being that it is illegal to kill endangered species, they're still doing it. Woohoo for the law! While some with law degrees have good intentions, the upper tiers of the state do not. Profits will always come before people, other animals, and the planet with laws and while some may seem to do good, there will always be a loophole (like the one the Japanese whalers are using) where profits and corporations will rule. That is why people have to take matters into their own hands. I don't understand why those doing "lawful" activism always bash that which is "unlawful" considering that "unlawful" acivism has played a huge part in all movements. Whether or not I alone am Gandhi or MLK or a black panther or whatever, people like you, using your logic back then, would have called their activism WRONG. People using your logic back then were the same acting if they were somehow better and more effective with their "lawful activism". The truth is, all of it has a place and the sooner people can respect ALL facets of activism rather than demonizing other activists as "good" or "bad", the sooner things will get done. The opposition works on divide and conquer and by falling for their bull you actually divide the movement. Let's work together rather than against each other. Both techniques have been proven to work- illegal and legal. To deny this is to deny history.
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|
|
|
|
|
"i also want a world where i can get up everyday and not have to deal with the pain of working, paying bills, worrying about health insurance," Typical lazy hippie pot-head communist wanna-be. You stupid punks have the same foolish pipe dreams that your dirty, STD infested, drugged out hippie parents thought were so great, until the food and sex and drugs ran out and they got JOBS. How many washed up hippies from the '60's are still living the dirt-ball life?
|
|
|
Report this comment |
|