Home » On Screen » Movie Reviews & Features
RSS XML


The Namesake


BY HARRY KLOMAN

Guess who's coming to dinner: Jacinda Barrett and Kal Penn

Guess who's coming to dinner: Jacinda Barrett and Kal Penn

Over 20 years, Mira Nair has created a canon of films you rarely regret having seen. Her newest, The Namesake, is no exception: More lovely than it is original or profound, it's another reflection on cross-culturalism, family ties and the nonviolent liberation of women from traditions that probably don't give way as easily in real life as they do in her films.

For this story, the Indian-born Nair works with the London-born, now-American Jhumpa Lahiri, who won the Pulitzer Prize for her short-story collection Interpreter of Maladies, and who wrote the novel on which The Namesake is based.

Lahiri writes intelligent, mannered, methodical fiction that lends itself to exegesis. Nair tends to tell her stories in captivating flashes and spurts. The Namesake feels like both of them -- at once very clear, but also rewardingly unsure of itself. No wonder that its characters end up more or less unable to choose between their worlds, and perfectly happy that they don't have to.

The story begins in 1974 on a train, where Ashoke Ganguli (Irfan Khan) enjoys the ride and buries himself in a book -- this time, the collected works of Nikolai Gogol. With him in the compartment is a jovial countryman who asks if he's ever seen "this world." He means England and the U.S., not a meaningless place like India. Ashoke, content to be Indian, can only quote his grandfather: "Books are for traveling without moving an inch."

Then, the train crashes, and Ashoke's life hurries along. He's in the hospital recovering. He's in America, getting a doctorate in fiber optics. Back home for a visit, he meets a woman, Ashima (portrayed by Tabu, the Meryl Streep of India), whom his family has chosen to be his wife (if she picks him over her other choices, which include a widower with four children). They marry and have two children, the children grow up, and their son (Kal Penn of Harold & Kumar) becomes a typical American kid: smoking weed with his friends, listening to hard rock in his room, getting accepted to Yale, and doing absolutely nothing to hide his embarrassment at his parents.

He's also embarrassed by his name. It's Gogol -- as in, Gogol Ganguli -- not exactly a chick magnet. Eventually he learns about the train accident and why his father chose the name. But that brief tale -- not even a revelation, at least to us -- comes with 45 minutes still to go in The Namesake. So it's really just a moment, a sort of transitional passage that catapults the story into its final act. "We all came out of Gogol's overcoat," the father says to the son, quoting a famous epigram about the story's influence on Russian literature. "One day you will understand." (I'm not sure I do: The connection between the two stories is rather tenuous.)

The first hour of The Namesake is its most satisfying, and in scene after scene, Nair gently reinforces her anxiety about living in two (or more) worlds. The first lovemaking between the newlyweds feels authentically awkward, a counterbalance to Gogol's more erotic sex life, first with an Anglo girlfriend (Jacinda Barrett), then with an Indian-American one. To the story's extended family of Indians in America, religion seems more like custom and superstition than deep faith. Do they really believe that waving chilies over Gogol's head will ward off evil spirits? Maybe, maybe not, but you suspect they can't convince themselves to risk defying fate.

And yet, as the teen-age Gogol grumbles through a visit to his parents' homeland -- where Nair swiftly shows us the best and worst of Calcutta -- he sparks up when they take him to see the Taj Mahal. He likes to draw, and it stirs his passion for architecture. Even so, it's hard not to be overwhelmed by such history, especially if it's your own.

The last half hour or so of Nair's film races through so many life changes that its conflicts feel more contrived than lived. The Namesake could easily be much longer, giving itself time to walk instead of run to its satisfying finish line. Her film isn't quite Intro to Indian Culture, nor is it advanced studies. Think of it as an intermediate class, taught by a professor who's still trying to solve the equation. In English, with moments of Bengali, Hindi and subtitles.

Starts Fri., March 30.


-- E-mail us about this story



Advertisement



Share this article:
Del.icio.us  digg  facebook  Google Bookmarks  Technorati 

COMMENTS
There are no comments yet for this story. You can be the first.

Post a comment




MORE BY HARRY KLOMAN
A Serious Man
The philosophical question at the center of A Serious Man is not what G-d has in store for its characters, who are all educated, middle-class Jews living in Minnesota, c. late 1960s. It's really what their almighty creators, J-el and Ethan C-en, have in mind to do with them. The film tells the story of a physics professor who's as close to a decision on his tenure as he is far from understanding the meaning of life. His wife meanwhile has fallen in love with a friend of 15 years. A Serious Man is a fable, like O Brother, Where Art Thou?, and its tone is otherworldly, like Barton Fink. The C-ens have mocked many other American subcultures in the past, so now it's the Jews' turn. It's often funny, just as often overstated, highly contrived, and really, in the long run, not terribly profound. The C-ens' work usually distills to a few simple ideas: You're on your own (i.e., there is no G-d), and people are fools, especially when they try to figure things out, whether it be themselves or others. So, how do you end a story like this? The C-ens have no mercy, but this time they outdo themselves, and it's hilarious, in a thoroughly horrifying sort of way. Starts Fri., Oct. 30. Manor (HK) [3 out of 4 stars] [October 29, 2009]
The Baader Meinhof Complex
In the 1960s, a radical leftist group formed in Germany and became known as the Baader Meinhof Group, after its two most disparate members. Director Uli Edel presents a relatively straightforward restaging of history, sprinkled with touches of familiar irony. He covers a decade of action in his film, and he uses a lot of racing montage sequences to pass time quickly. These scenes are all expertly crafted, and when people get beaten, kicked, trampled or shot in the face, you feel the crack and sting. (Only the dopey action music on the soundtrack undermines Edel's technique.) This first wave of the group begins to fall apart when the police marshal every law-enforcement agency in the country and clean some serious house. And so each party in this scheme of history does what it must: The radicals act radically, and the police police. They say that if we forget our history, then we're doomed to repeat it. But those who remember never seem to do much better. In German, with subtitles. Starts Fri., Oct. 23. Regent Square (HK) [2.5 out of 4 stars] [October 22, 2009]
Lorna's Silence
Lorna, an Albania in Belgium, has married a junkie, hoping to get citizenship papers. She is also plotting to intentionally overdose him, so a further chain of payoffs and citizenship can occur. Most things happen to the characters in the second half of the film, and that's the problem: For about an hour, we watch Lorna grudgingly tend to her obligation, caring for her clingy ersatz husband through his withdrawal, and we wonder where the filmmakers are going. This sort of lean storytelling is a trademark of Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne. Their gritty, gloomy, realistic work recalls many better and more emotionally balanced French films of the early 1970s, and over the years, it's sort of set the tone for the slice-of-life dreariness (generally, I mean that as a compliment) of Belgium's small national cinema. But Dardennes parcel out their plot points so sparingly that you begin to wonder if the actors even know what they're doing. If you can tolerate such haziness, Lorna's Silence has its rewards. The actors inhabit their roles in a way that compels you to watch, even if you don't know exactly what's happening. Of course, having context would deepen our attachment, not just to their emotions, but to the film's ideas about love and redemption that the Dardennes want to explore.  In French, Russian and Albanian, with subtitles. Starts Sat., Sept. 26. Harris (HK) [2.5 out of 4 stars] [September 24, 2009]

My Profile | My Settings
Promo E-mail Sign up  |  Win Free Stuff  |  Advertising Info  |  Contact Us  |  Freelance/Intern Guide
Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2009, Pittsburgh City Paper   RSS