Home » Blogs » Slag Heap
RSS XML

Burgess in the running for city council president


BY CHRIS POTTER

So much for the post-election lull. City councilor Ricky Burgess is campaigning to be the next president of city council -- a position  currently held by Doug Shields. And while such contests are usually of interest to only a small number of City Hall junkies, who becomes council president next year may say a lot about the future, and the relationship between a newly-elected mayor and the legislators across the hall. 

Interviewed in his office, Burgess said he decided -- "somewhat relucantly" --  to seek the post, which will be chosen by the nine-member council early next year. The president, he says, must "serve all nine members of council," while being a "fair negotiator with the mayor and his administration. I believe the position cannot be an audition for mayor, but must be held by someone who can work honestly and collaboratively with the mayor, so we can work to address the needs of the city." 

There needs to be "open dialogue between the administration and council," he says. And "discussions via accusations, slander, and calling for criminal investigation are not the best way to move our city forward."

Does that sound like Burgess might have some problems with the often-irascible Shields? Well, let it be noted here that Burgess didn't say that.

"I am not running because of anything anyone has done," he says. "I'm running because of what could be."

Now I know what you're thinking, or at least what you're worried about. Is all this talk about collaboration and "moving the city forward" (paging Ms. Montanez!) a sign that Ravenstahl would have a reliable ally at the head of council's table? 

"My history on council has shown me to be an independent person," Burgess says. "I have a long track record of being independent, and I don't see why two years on council should trump all my years of community service." 

Burgess gives credit to Ravenstahl for "doing more to empower the minority population than any mayor in history." (He points to the fact that the city's police chief and fire chief are black, and that Ravenstahl appointed Dara Ware Allen to the school board --  which he points out may be the first black school-board appointee to represent a district that was mostly black. "I don't think that's gotten enough attention," says Burgess.)

Still, he says that there will likely to be issues on which he -- and the rest of council -- will disagree with the mayor. The problem isn't the disagreements themselves, but the fact that they have become so acrimonious. To address that problem, Burgess says, he's wants to hold regularly scheduled meetings with the mayor, and to designate a council staffer as a liasion with the mayor's office. 

Burgess says it's high time to change the dynamic on Grant Street, in part because the mayor has, finally, won a four-year term. Both sides of city government have frequently been in campaign mode, he says -- but as of now, "This mayor has been elected by the vast majority of the city. It is time to realize that he is the mayor, and for council to begin that process of engaging him in a constructive way." Burgess says one reason he's a natural go-between is because "I don't have mayoral ambitions." 

What does Shields think of all this? Suffice it to say the council presidency appears to be the one thing he isn't feeling worked up about.

"I'm certainly open to new leadership on council," he said. "I've served two terms as president, and it's not easy. I'm in my 17th year on the fifth floor [having served as a councilor and aide to the late Bob O'Connor], and I don't have a lot of illusions left. Whether I'm the council president or someone else is, the communications problem will remain. Because for this administration, council isn't something to work with; it's something to be ignored. If Mr. Burgess thinks that will change, he's fooling himself."

When I asked if Shields even intended to run for the spot again, he made it clear he wouldn't run very hard.  "Do I need the presidency to launch a run for something else?" he asked. "Not really. Do I need to prove anything more? I think I've earned a reputation for being hard-working, and for having integrity. I'm secure with myself."

Shields says that if his fellow councilors "vote for me, I'll accept it. If people want to move on, that's OK too."

Will the rest of council be so philosophical? It remains to be seen. So far, I've heard speculation about presidential aspirations on the part of at five councilors -- a majority of the body. But as one councilor told me, "That's how it always is at this point. It's like an episode of Law & Order: The first suspect is never the person who did it." 


-- E-mail Chris Potter about this post.



Advertisement



Share this article:
Del.icio.us  digg  facebook  Google Bookmarks  Technorati 

COMMENTS
2 comments posted for this article
Bram R, North Side
 11/10/2009 - 5:17pm
   Burgess has a legitimate shot at the position, but he's not where I'd put my money. His coming out to campaign for it early, frankly and publicly (through you!) is an interesting stratagem that will probably do him more good than harm, but still...
   
   Don't count out Peduto. The consensus may be that Shields has run his course, but Peduto's been soldiering through for more years than any and he's more productive, constructive and conciliatory than he's ever been. AND don't count out the respect ANY given Council member has for the idea of recommending an investigation WHEN there's something it'd be really productive to investigate.
Report this comment
Ed Heath, Stanton Heights
 11/10/2009 - 3:15pm
   The Reverend has voted with the Mayor's allies more than occasionally but I won't say always. I wouldn't say he was the Mayor's pawn, but I wonder if he has been trying to curry favor with the Mayor. Still, he might hold true to his word and be an independent Council President.
   
   What worries me more is that my impression of the Ravenstahl administration is that they see Pittsburgh politics as a zero sum game. You are either with them or against them on all issues, and they appear to hold grudges. The first issue where Burgess exercised independence might be the last issue where he was able to "work with" the Mayor's office. Particularly now the Mayor seems to moving in some dangerous directions budget-wise and he does not seem open to input from other people. He has just won re-election, and if the turnout was low, that just means that even if his opponents are determined and have a loyal and determined following, and even if the rest of the electorate is apathetic, Ravenstahl will still win. He can do no wrong, apparently, and he has decided to (continue to) behave that way.
   
   If Burgess does win the Presidency, he might find his diplomatic skills are not enough to win over Ravenstahl.
   
   And where does Council have money for a Mayoral liaison?
Report this comment

Post a comment




MORE BY CHRIS POTTER
My Profile | My Settings
Promo E-mail Sign up  |  Win Free Stuff  |  Advertising Info  |  Contact Us  |  Freelance/Intern Guide
Powered by Gyrosite © Copyright 2009, Pittsburgh City Paper   RSS